Marriage, Covert Contracts, and the Illusion of Security

Marriage is often spoken about as a promise of love, devotion, and partnership. On the surface, it appears simple: two people choose each other, make vows, and commit to building a life together. But marriage is not just a personal or spiritual agreement. It is also a legal contract, sanctioned and enforced by the state, layered with social expectations that are rarely spoken aloud.

This is where the idea of covert contracts enters the conversation.

A covert contract is an agreement that exists without being clearly named or consciously consented to. It’s when expectations, obligations, or roles are assumed rather than negotiated. And marriage, as an institution, is full of them.

Marriage as a Contract (Whether We Like It or Not)

On one level, marriage functions as a social contract. It encompasses mutual promises, shared responsibilities, and behavioral expectations—ideas often explored in relationship psychology and mainstream discourse, including sources such as Psychology Today. Society expects married people to prioritize one another, make joint decisions, and conform to certain relational norms.

On another level, marriage is a legal contract. The state formalizes vows through licenses and certificates, merging two individuals into a recognized legal unit. Property ownership, taxes, inheritance, medical decision-making, and even debt are governed by this structure. Divorce courts, not personal conversations, ultimately arbitrate the end of that agreement.

This blending of love and law makes marriage more than a private handshake. It becomes a public institution, governed by rules many people never fully examine until something goes wrong.

Where the “Covert” Part Comes In

Unlike a business contract—where terms are spelled out, negotiated, and signed—marriage carries hidden clauses shaped by history and culture.

Many of these expectations are inherited rather than chosen.

Gender roles that dictate who carries emotional labor, caregiving, or financial responsibility.Assumptions about monogamy, sexual access, and lifelong exclusivity. Beliefs about hierarchy: spouse over self, marriage over all other relationships. Cultural scripts that equate control with safety and ownership with love.

These norms often operate invisibly. When they’re not met, resentment and conflict arise—not because someone “broke the rules,” but because the rules were never explicitly named or consciously agreed to.

In this sense, marriage can function like a covert contract: a social and legal system of expectations, even when it no longer reflects the lived realities or values of the people within it.

A Personal Perspective: Questioning the Structure, Not Love

For me, the discomfort has never been about commitment or care. It’s about the system marriage lives inside.

Signing a contract that feels embedded in hierarchical, patriarchal, and colonial frameworks raises real questions. These systems have historically been designed to control people, bodies, land, and resources—often in the name of security and power. Marriage, as an institution, has frequently mirrored those same dynamics: ownership, exclusivity, and legitimacy granted by authority rather than mutual consent.

As I’ve come out as polyamorous, one thing has become increasingly clear: loving multiple people at once has very little to do with sex. It has everything to do with the structures we’re taught to rely on for safety.

Polyamory exposed how deeply we’re conditioned to believe that security comes from conformity—following “the rules,” choosing the approved path, and organizing love into rigid hierarchies. But those norms often create false security. They promise stability while quietly demanding self-abandonment, silence, or shrinking to fit.

Love Beyond False Contracts

This isn’t an argument against marriage for everyone. It’s an invitation to see it clearly.

Marriage is not just love. It is love filtered through law, culture, and history. When we don’t examine those layers, we risk entering agreements loaded with expectations we never consented to—and calling the resulting pain a personal failure instead of a structural one.

Real security doesn’t come from ownership, control, or rigid norms. It comes from clarity, choice, and ongoing consent. Whether married, unmarried, monogamous, or polyamorous, the deeper work is the same: naming our expectations out loud, dismantling inherited scripts that don’t serve us, and choosing relationships rooted in honesty rather than covert contracts.

Because love, when it’s free, doesn’t need hidden clauses to survive.

---

If you’re curious what this could even look like in practice, let’s have a conversation. Visit https://www.raylifecoaching.com/contact. I’d love to share with you what I’ve been working on for the past three years—work that has helped me and others move toward consensual, secure relating and more fulfilling lives.